Кинетические исследования поверхностных и внутриклеточных лиганд-рецепторных взаимодействий с помощью проточной цитометрии и лазерной сканирующей микроскопии

47. Melamed M.R., Lindmo T. Flow Cytometry and Sorting, Mendelson M.L. (eds.). - New York: Wiley-Liss, 1990. – 824 P.

48. McCarthy D.A., Macey M.G. Cytometric analysis of cell phenotype and function. Cambridge University Press, 2001. – 413 P.

49. Labus J.M., Petersen B.H. Quantitation of human anti-mouse antibody in serum by flow cytometry.// Cytometry - 1992. - V.13. - P. 275-281.

50. Sklar L.A., Finney D.A., Oades Z.G., Jesaitis A.J., Painter R.G., Cochrane C.G. The dynamics of ligand-receptor interactions. // J. Biol. Chem. - 1984. - V.259. - P. 5661-5669.

51. Sklar L.A., Edwards B.S., Graves S.W., Nolan J.P., Prossnitz E.R. Flow cytometric analysis of ligand-receptor interactions and molecular assemblies. // Annu. Rev. Biophys.

Biomol. Struct. - 2002. - V.31. - P. 97-119.

52. Зенин В.В., Аксенов Н.Д., Шатрова А.Н., Клопов Н.В., Крам Л.С., Полетаев А.И.

Устройство для предобработки образца при анализе методом цитометрии в потоке. // Биофизика - 1999. - Т.44. – С. 303-312.

53. Surovtsev I.V., Razumov I.A., Nekrasov V.M., Shvalov A.N., Soini J.T., Maltsev V.P., Petrov A.P., Loktev V.B., Chernyshev A.V. Mathematical modeling the kinetics of cell distribution in the process of ligand-receptor binding. // Journal of Theoretical Biology V.206. – P. 407-417.

54. Tenbaum S, Baniahmad A. Nuclear receptors: structure, function and involvement in disease. // Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. - 1997 – V.29. – P. 1325-1341.

55. Розен В.Б., Смирнов А.Н. Рецепторы и стероидные гормоны - Москва: изд-во МГУ, 1981. – 312 с.

56. Carlstedt-Duke J., Eriksson H., Gustafsson J.-E. (eds). The steroid/thyroid hormone receptor family and gene regulation - Basel: Birkhauser Verlag,. 1989. – 260 P.

57. Freedman, L.P. (ed.) Molecular biology of steroid and nuclear hormone receptors, Birkhauser - Boston, 1998. – 209 P.

58. Misteli T. Protein dynamics: implications for nuclear architecture and gene expression. // Science - 2001. – V.291. – P. 843-847.

59. Phair, R.D., Misteli T. High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus. // Nature - 2000. – V.404. – P. 604-609.

60. Rippe K. Dynamic organization of the cell nucleus. // Curr Opin Genet Dev. - 2007. – V.17. - P. 373-380.

61. Lippincott-Schwartz J., Patterson G.H. Development and use of fluorescent protein markers in living cells. // Science. - 2003. – V.300. – P. 87-91.

62. Tsien R.Y. The green uorescent protein. // Annu Rev Biochem. - 1998. – V.67. – P. 509Reits E.A., Neefjes J.J. From fixed to FRAP: measuring protein mobility and activity in living cells. // Nat Cell Biol. - 2001. – V.3. – P. E145-E147.

64. Pederson T. Diffusional protein transport within the nucleus: a message in the medium. // Nat Cell Biol. - 2000. – V.2. – P. E73-E74.

65. Seksek O., Biwersi J., Verkman A.S. Translational diffusion of macromolecule-sized solutes in cytoplasm and nucleus. // J Cell Biol. – 1997. – V.138. P. 131-142.

66. Beaudouin J., Mora-Bermudez F., Klee T., Daigle N., Ellenberg J. Dissecting the contribution of diffusion and interactions to the mobility of nuclear proteins. // Biophys J. V.90. - P. 1878-1894.

67. Carrero G., Crawford E., Hendzel M.J., de Vries G. Characterizing fluorescence recovery curves for nuclear proteins undergoing binding events. // Bull Math Biol. - 2004. – V.66. P.

1515-1545.

68. Carrero G., Crawford E., Th'ng J., de Vries G., and Hendzel M.J. Quantification of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions in vivo, using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. // Methods Enzymol. - 2004. – V.375. – P. 415-442.

69. Hinow P., Rogers C.E., Barbieri C.E., Pietenpol J.A., Kenworthy A.K., DiBenedetto E.The DNA binding activity of p53 displays reaction-diffusion kinetics. // Biophys J. - 2006.

– V.91. – P. 330-342.

70. Phair R.D., Scaffidi P., Elbi C., Vecerova J., Dey A., Ozato K., Brown D.T., Hager G., Bustin M., Misteli T. Global nature of dynamic protein-chromatin interactions in vivo: threedimensional genome scanning and dynamic interaction networks of chromatin proteins. // Mol Cell Biol. - 2004. – V. 24. – P. 6393-6402.

71. Halford S.E., Marko J.F. How do site-specific DNA-binding proteins find their targets? // Nucleic Acids Res. - 2004. – V.32. – P. 3040-3052.

72. van Holde K., Zlatanova J. Scanning chromatin: a new paradigm? // J Biol Chem. - 2006.

– V.281. – P. 12197-12200.

73 Farla P., Hersmus R., Trapman J., Houtsmuller A.B. Antiandrogens prevent stable DNAbinding of the androgen receptor. // J Cell Sci. - 2005. – V.118. P. 4187-4198.

74. McNally J.G., Muller W.G., Walker D., Wolford R., Hager G.L. The glucocorticoid receptor: rapid exchange with regulatory sites in living cells. // Science - 2000. – V.287. – P.

1262-1265.

75. Sprague B.L., Muller F., Pego R.L., Bungay P.M., Stavreva D.A., McNally J.G. Analysis of binding at a single spatially localized cluster of binding sites by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. // Biophys J. - 2006. – V.91. P. 1169-1191.

76. Perlmann T., Eriksson P., Wrange O. Quantitative analysis of the glucocorticoid receptorDNA interaction at the mouse mammary tumor virus glucocorticoid response element. // J Biol Chem. - 1990. – V.265. P. 17222-17229.

77. Ridgway P., Almouzni G. Chromatin assembly and organization. // J Cell Sci. - 2001. – V.114. - P. 2711-2712.

78. Karpova T.S., Chen T.Y., Sprague B.L., McNally J.G. Dynamic interactions of a transcription factor with DNA are accelerated by a chromatin remodeller. // EMBO Rep. V.5. – P. 1064-1070.

79. Guigas G., Weiss M. Sampling the cell with anomalous diffusion - the discovery of slowness. // Biophys J. - 2008. – V.94. – P. 90-94.

80. Minton A.P. How can biochemical reactions within cells differ from those in test tubes? // J Cell Sci. - 2006. – V.119. – P. 2863-2869.

81. Saxton M.J. Chemically limited reactions on a percolation cluster. // The Journal of Chemical Physics. - 2002. – V.116. – P. 203-208.

82. Zhou H.-X., Rivas G., Minton A.P. Macromolecular crowding and confinement:

biochemical, biophysical, and potential physiological consequences. // Annu Rev Biophys. V.37. – P. 375-397.

83. Wolffe A.P. Nucleosome positioning and modification. chromatin structures that potenilate transcription. // Trends Biochem. Sci. – 1994. - V.19. - P. 240–244.

84. Jenuwein T., Allis C.D. Translating the histone code. // Science – 2001. - V.293. – P.

1074–1080.

85. Thiagalingam S., Cheng K.H., Lee H.J., Mineva N., Thiagalingam A., Ponte J.F. Histone deacetylases: unique players in shaping the epigenetic histone code. // Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. – 2003. – V.983. – P. 84–100.

86. Turner B.M. Cellular memory and the histone code. // Cell – 2002. – V.111. – P. 285–291.

87. Braunstein M., Sobel R.E., Allis C.D., Turner B.M., Broach J.R. Efficient transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a heterochromatin histone acetylation pattern // Mol. Cell Biol. – 1996. - V.16. – P. 4349–4356.

88. Лавров С.А., Кибанов М.В. Некодирующие РНК и структура хроматина. // Успехи биологической химии – 2007 - Т.47. - С. 53-88.

89. Tsukada Y., Fang J., Erdjument-Bromage H., Warren M.E., Borchers C.H., Tempst P., Zhang Y. Histone demethylation by a family of JmjC domain-containing proteins. // Nature – 2006 – V. 439. – P. 811–816.

90. Ebert A., Schotta G., Lein S., Kubicek S., Krauss V., Jenuwein T., Reuter G. Su(var) genes regulate the balance between euchromatin and heterochromatin in Drosophila. // Genes Dev. - 2004. - V.18. – P. 2973–2983.

91. Schotta G., Ebert A., Dorn R., Reuter G. Position-effect variegation and the genetic dissection of chromatin regulation in Drosophila. // Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. – 2003. – V.14. – P. 67–75.

92. Weiler K.S., Wakimoto B.T. Suppression of heterochromatic gene variegation can be used to distinguish and characterize E(var) genes potentially important for chromosome structure in Drosophila melanogaster. // Mol. Genet. Genomics – 2002. - V.266. – P. 922–932.

93. Czermin B., Schotta G., Hulsmann B.B., Brehm A., Becker P.B., Reuter G., Imhof A.

Physical and functional association of SU(VAR)3-9 and HDAC1 in Drosophila. // EMBO Rep. - 2001. – V.2. - P. - 915–919.

94. Schotta G., Ebert A., Krauss V., Fischer A., Hoffmann J., Rea S., Jenuwein T., Dorn R., Reuter G. Central role of Drosophila SU(VAR)3-9 in histone H3-K9 methylation and heterochromatic gene silencing. // EMBO J. - 2002. – V.21. - P. 1121–1131.

95. Min J., Zhang Y., Xu R.M. Structural basis for specific binding of Polycomb chromodomain to histone H3 methylated at Lys 27. // Genes Dev. – 2003. - V.17. - P. 1823– 1828.

96. Fischle W., Wang Y., Jacobs S.A., Kim Y., Allis C.D., Khorasanizadeh S. Molecular basis for the discrimination of repressive methyl-lysine marks in histone H3 by Polycomb and HP1 chromodomains. // Genes Dev. – 2003. – V.17. - P. 1870–1881.

97. Brehm A., Tufteland K.R., Aasland R., Becker P.B. The many colours of chromodomains.

// Bioessays - 2004. - V.26. - P. 133–140.

98. Akhtar A., Zink D., Becker P.B. Chromodomains are protein-RNA interaction modules. // Nature – 2000. - V.407. - P. 405–409.

99. Bannister A.J., Zegerman P., Partridge J.F., Miska E.A., Thomas J.O., Allshire R.C., Kouzarides T. Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. // Nature - 2001 - V.410. - P. 120–124.

100. Shareef M.M., Badugu R., Kellum R. HP1/ORC complex and heterochromatin assembly. // Genetica – 2003. – V.117. – P. 127–134.

101. Seum C., Pauli D., Delattre M., Jaquet Y., Spierer A., Spierer P. Isolation of Su(var)3- mutations by homologous recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. // Genetics – 2002. – V.161. - P. 1125–1136.

102. Pirrotta V., Poux S., Melfi R., Pilyugin M. Assembly of Polycomb complexes and silencing mechanisms. // Genetica – 2003. - V.117. - P. 191–197.

103. Simon J.A. Polycomb group proteins – Quick Guide. // Curr. Biol. – 2003. – V.13. - P.

R79–80.

104. Pirrotta V. Chromatin complexes regulating gene expression in Drosophila. // Curr.

Opin. Genet. Dev. – 1995. – V.5. – P. 466–472.

105. Chanas G., Lavrov S., Iral F., Cavalli G., Maschat F. Engrailed and polyhomeotic maintain posterior cell identity through cubitus-interruptus regulation. // Dev. Biol. – 2004. – V.272. – P. 522–535.

106. Ringrose L., Rehmsmeier M., Dura J.M., Paro R. Genome-wide prediction of Polycomb/Trithorax response elements in Drosophila melanogaster. // Dev. Cell – 2003. – V.5. – P. 759–771.

107. Negre N., Hennetin J., Sun L.V., Lavrov S., Bellis M., White K.P., Cavalli G.